Skip to content

exploring trust

October 26, 2014

My reading around neoliberalism, new managerialism, hyper-accountability and the educational audit culture since July this year has forced me to confront notions of trust, especially while undertaking Performance and Development processes with colleagues in my workplace. Trust was previously something I had taken forgranted.

Given what I was learning, questions lingered:

  • Could I (honestly – despite the reading) place trust in processes?
  • What am I doing – and want to maintain – to ensure I am trusted in my role?
  • Is feedback the only mechanism available for gauging accuracy of perceptions?
  • Can policy documents and protocols assist in generating trust?

 

FullSizeRender (3)

IMG_4522

IMG_4523

IMG_4524

IMG_4526

According to one philosopher

we may not have evidence for a crisis of trust: but we have massive evidence of a culture of suspicion (O’Neill, 2002, p.6).

Despite best efforts and intentions, it seems likely that school leaders in current climates of performativity will be viewed askance ie with suspicion. And therein lies uneasy discomfiture: How can we read the signs?

 

Selected references

Appelo, J. (n.d.). Plan, do, check, act. [Image]. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurgenappelo/6797304278/sizes/z/in/photostream/

O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: Reith lectures. BBC Radio 4. Retrieved October 26, 2014  http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rmhttp/radio4/transcripts/20020403_reith.pdf

 

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: